State Program for School District Building Construction
Idaho Code §33-909
Public School Facilities Cooperative Funding Program
Summary
This section of Idaho Code defines a funding process for School Districts that seek to replace unsafe school buildings. The process may be initiated either by a local Board of Trustees or by the administrator of the State Division of Building Safety. In either case, a new school proposal is submitted to the Public School Facilities Cooperative Funding Program panel. The panel reviews the proposal and may approve, modify, or reject it. If approved or modified, the proposal then goes to local voters in a Bond Election. If voters fail to approve the bond, the Public School Facilities Cooperative Funding Program will initiate funding, designate a district supervisor to oversee the project, and complete the approved or modified plan for the district’s new school. The Public School Facilities Cooperative Funding Program administrators will then levy taxes on the school district community to repay the cooperative funding program for the new school project.
Eligibility
Any school district that has failed to approve at least one (1) or more bond levies for the repair, renovation or replacement of existing unsafe facilities, within the two (2) year period immediately preceding submission of the application is eligible to apply for Public School Facilities Cooperative Funding Program funds.
Process Sequence – District Initiated Proposal
1. Local Board of Trustees identifies unsafe school conditions.
(a) Building Inspections
(b) Engineering Evaluations/Reports
2. Local Board of Trustees submits proposal, including:
(a) The identified school building safety hazards and such other information necessary to document the deficiencies [engineering reports and inspections];
(b) The school district's plan for abating the defects, including costs and sources and amounts of revenue available to the school district [DesignWest proposal];
(c) The market value for assessment purposes of the school district [total tax base for district tax valuation]; and
(d) A detailed accounting of all bond and plant facility levies of the school district and the revenues raised by such levies.
3. Public School Facilities Cooperative Funding Program panel reviews the proposal and either approves, modifies, or rejects the plan.
4. If the plan is approved or modified, Local Board of Trustees submits funding for the plan (Bond Proposal) to district voters.
5. If the Bond proposal is approved, the Local Board of Trustees moves forward with the Bond and new school construction.
6. If rejected, “the state board of education shall appoint a district supervisor for interim state supervision of the local school district. The district supervisor shall be responsible for ensuring that the project, as approved by the panel, is completed and shall regularly report to the panel in a manner as determined by the panel upon approval of the project.” (IC §33-909) A State-appointed construction manager is appointed to oversee the Salmon District project.
7. Taxes will then be levied by the state on the local district tax base to repay the cost of the project.
Process Sequence – State Division of Building Safety Initiated Proposal
Steps 1 and 2 above are initiated by the administrator of the State Division of Building Safety. Steps 3-7 proceed as listed above, using the plan proposed by the administrator of the State Division of Building Safety.
Implications for Salmon District #291
- We currently have both engineering studies and inspection reports necessary to initiate a proposal.
- We have run multiple failed Bond elections in the past two years.
- We have a cost-effective plan for consolidating two unsafe schools (along with CDC and Life Skills buildings) into a single ADA compliant facility.
- Once application is made, the District has no control over modifications State fund administrators may make on the plan we submit.
- Once the plan is approved or modified, the District has no control over supervision of the completion of the plan.
- The Salmon Community will ultimately pay for the project whether approved as a Bond or completed under direction of the State Board’s appointed supervisor. We are currently investigating the actual tax impact (term and levy amount) if the State initially funds the project, then sets repayment rates for our community.
Wednesday, March 14, 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

It is too bad it has to come to this but I believe that it does. Don't blame the yes voters.
ReplyDeletegood idea to investigate why patrons vote "no." maybe "no" is not a vote against the new facility, but something else.
ReplyDeleteso question should be: "why the no vote?"
How many times do you invite the NO voters to express their reasons? And if their reasons are easily explained through fact or education on state law, interest rates, historical events, engineering reports, tours, etc how many times do you beat your head against a wall? Until an earthquake? Condemnation? Time is up, call the state.
ReplyDeleteWhat seems to not be working is the selling point that the present school needs to be replaced, its a great time to build, and if we don't it will get shut down. Those that are voting no are not flinching with the threats, nor seem to be inspired to buy-in since its onset and have a distrust with the board. (from the street)
ReplyDeleteAn additional piece of the mistrust maybe with the monetary proposals going anywhere from 26 million down to 12.9 million.
Most of the presentations are going to the "choir" and fail to get to the hearts of the nays.
I am planning a visit to a new school in Ammon built by Dome Technology out of Idaho Falls to see if there is a good fit. You are all invited when I get the exact date. Kinda like a field trip.
Though I continue to vote yes and will continue to do so I have yet to be really inspired that we are in deed moving forward. My hopes in building a new school have little to do with what is above and much more to do with what follows.
WHY I WANT
I WANT TO BUILD A NEW SCHOOL
I WOULD LIKE TO CREATE A GREATER FEELING OF FAMILY AND COMMUNITY
I WOULD LIKE CREATE THE FEELING OF BEING SPECIAL YET EQUAL
I WOULD LIKE TO EXPAND THE BELIEF THAT LEARNING IS FROM THE CRADLE TO THE GRAVE
I WOULD LIKE TO BUILD A NEW SCHOOL SO THAT AIR QUALITY IS SO GOOD THAT TEACHERS AND STUDENTS ALIKE WISH TO ATTEND AND DO SO AT A HIGH RATE BECAUSE THEY ARE HEALTHY AND IN A GREAT ENVIRONMENT
I WOULD LIKE BUILD A NEW SCHOOL AND MAKE IT AS EASY AS POSSIBLE ON ALL TAX PAYERS IN BUILDING COSTS AND ENERGY COSTS
I WOULD LIKE TO BUILD A SCHOOL THAT IS THE MOST ENERGY EFFIEICENT SCHOOL IN IDAHO
I WOULD LIKE TO BUILD A SCHOOL THAT WILL LAST FOR CENTURIES
I WOULD LIKE TO BUILD A SCHOOL THAT ROCKS THE FOUNDATION OF THE NORM
I WOULD LIKE TO BUILD A NEW SCHOOL SO STUDENTS FROM OUTSIDE THE AREA COME TO ATTEND
I WOULD LIKE TO BUILD A NEW SCHOOL THAT WILL HELP IN AFFECTIONATLY NURTURING STUDENTS TO BE THE BEST THEY CAN BE
I WOULD LIKE TO BUILD A NEW SCHOOL THAT IS NOTED FOR ITS EXCELLANCE IN PREPARING STUDENTS FOR LIFE
I WOULD LIKE TO BUILD A NEW SCHOOL BECAUSE I BELIEF THAT IT WILL HELP ALL IN THE COMMUNITY OF SALMON
While I agree with some of what you mention, for the most part, the NO's are just NO. No matter what you show them, tell them, teach them, give them, make concessions to them, they are still NO. I personally have heard enough excuses, blame, etc and find that you can't reason with those that just fundamentally do not want to pay for a new school. I think bringing over 500 yes people, almost double the YES votes from August, is a pretty good jump forward, but obviously there is still work ahead. I don't feel a new design, or approach will help, there are already enough "old" plans out there that people can't remember which attempt was for what anymore, it's just becoming one big mess.
DeleteThat is progress. Maybe just grind it out is the answer.
ReplyDeleteThank you for this dialogue. I personally continue to promote community input on what is happening in the entire process.
ReplyDelete- Joey